≡ Menu

In other words, get our little and big kids learning.  What are we waiting for?  An economic depression in which the most creative thing we can come up with is spending money on bread and circuses, casinos, and throwback jerseys?  Wait.

TechDailyDose | Top Scientists Urge Access To Research

A group of Nobel Prize-winning scientists are urging Congress to pass legislation that would provide the public with free online access to federally funded research. In a letter to members of Congress sent earlier this week, 41 Nobel Prize-winning scientists in medicine, physics, and chemistry called on lawmakers to pass the Federal Research Public Access Act, offered by Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., and Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas., which would require online public access to the published results of research funded through 11 U.S. agencies and departments. Peer-reviewed journal articles stemming from publicly funded research also would have to be made available online within six months of publication, under the bill.

“For America to obtain an optimal return on our investment in science, publicly funded research must be shared as broadly as possible,” wrote the scientists, who are part of the Alliance for Taxpayer Access coalition. “Yet, too often, research results are not available to researchers, scientists, or members of the public.” The bill has been referred to Lieberman’s committee, but the panel has yet to act on the measure.

The federal government funds over $60 billion in research annually.  I can’t find my own theses online, but Elsevier will sell you my journal paper for a hefty fee.  Taxpayers paid for all of that research.  It’s not enough to pass such an act, though.  Information access requires a decent human interface, extremely intelligent search capabilities and expert database maintenance.   “Immediately available” – I do not think this phrase means what you think it means.

2 comments

This is a Test

Looks like yesterday’s post titled links for 2009-11-05 posted and reposted itself a dozen times overnight, eventually turning into links for 2009-11-06. I use the Blog Autoposting Tool (Beta) on del.icio.us which “creates a daily post of your latest bookmarks to your blog.” I wonder whether it went nuts or my WordPress install is on the fritz.

So, I’ve killed the blog posting job and the offending post itself, and will post links manually from now on. If this post does not regurgitate and spew like the last one did, it’s a del.icio.us thing. Otherwise, it’s a WordPress fail.  The last thing I need right now is pushing around WordPress innards.

Are you sure you want to learn how to blog? This sh*t be overrated, y’all.

UPDATE: It was totally del.icio.us’s fault. That’s what you get for relying on Beta.

2 comments

links for 2009-11-04

0 comments

General Robert Van Antwerp, chief of the US Army Corps of Engineers, recently stated that “New Orleans can no longer be protected from hurricane storm surges” and that “half of Louisiana will be under water by 2100.”

Back off, man. I’m a scientist. The latest research indicates that sea level will rise at most 1 to 1.3 meters in the next century. At below left is what that ~1 meter of sea level rise looks like on a map. [Source: University of Arizona Environmental Studies Lab Sea Level Rise Viewer]  While New Orleans will be affected, I’d hardly call that half of Louisiana.

Louisiana - 1 meter Sea Level Rise New England - 1 meter Sea Level Rise

Now take a close look at the picture on the right. While New Orleans will be affected, so will the entire northeastern seaboard including beloved New York City and our nation’s capital. I dare General van Antwerp to go up to Washington D.C. and say it cannot be protected. A word that comes to mind is “pilloried.”

If we are the most awesome country on the planet, why can we not accomplish what the Dutch have?  So, don’t say it can’t be done, just admit you are not the one to do it.

And then former New Orleans Recovery Czar Ed Blakely’s pronouncement that New Orleans “isn’t likely” to be around 100 years from now because the Mississippi River and another hurricane/flood would “wipe New Orleans off the map.”  I agree with him to a certain extent about some of his other points on New Orleans’s recovery and how it is plagued by racial distrust, corruption, apathy and inertia.  Blakely is no climatologist, however, and should have stopped there. Besides, how can you take seriously a man who had a church razed “with the statement that God was angry at [its parishioners] for not repairing the church in a more timely fashion?”

New Orleans can recover and be protected from storm surges.  It requires a monumental feat of engineering that can then be applied to other American coastal cities when their time comes.  More than that, it requires honest folks who have a clear scientific and sociopolitical understanding of the situation and possess the nuts to ask for help.  Not those who blindly and singlehandedly take on monumental projects, make asinine decisions based on shoddy research (or for personal gain) and express sour grapes on their way out.  It can be done.

Also read:
Richard | Ed Blakely: so close, and yet …
Cliff | Don’t be mad at Ed Blakely. Be mad at yourself.

4 comments

Randall at VizWorld noticed that Weather Underground has a new 3D weather radar feature.  “They overlay the existing 2D terrain & radar map with a 3d isosurface extracted from the data.”  It requires a quick install of the Unity Web Player.  (By the way, the Unity game/environment development tool is now available for FREE. Go download now.)

3d-weather

Not to be outdone, weather.com has a new feature, too.  Mapperz discovered “the new ‘Future’ button starts moving into a predicted mode using [TruPoint Beta] technology at 15 minute intervals up to 6 hours into the future.”  Looks like it may warm up this evening.

weather-future

0 comments