≡ Menu

I can already see how important this issue is to you.

California Drops State Rock Over Asbestos Content

Californian state senator Gloria Romero’s (D-East Los Angeles) bill (SB 624) looks to give the state mineral Serpentine the boot because some deposits contain a small amount of asbestos. Romero states, “[Serpentine] contains the deadly mineral chrysotile asbestos, a known carcinogen, exposure to which increases the risk of the cancer mesothelioma.”

Dear Senator Romero, East Los Angeles has far worse problems like its citizens being mistaken for illegals over in Arizona, not to mention crushing poverty and the fact that your state budget is now weeks overdue.

What we need is a bill to teach science given that the state legislature doesn’t even know what asbestos, serpentine and serpentinite are to begin with.

From Looking For Detachment

Asbestos is not a single mineral, and in fact isn’t the name of any defined mineral at all. Asbestiform is a particular mineralogical habit that some minerals take: long fibers often in veins or masses. Asbestiform and fibrous, as crystal forms, are similar, with asbestiform being a more extreme version of fibrous.

and the Lab Lemming

There are 20 forms of serpentine, only one of which is an asbestos mineral. The very dangerous amphibole asbestos minerals specifically mentioned in the bill are completely unrelated to serpentine.

Forget all of the above and ask yourself this: How does “outlawing” serpentin(ite) prevent or cure mesothelioma?

This is what happens when science, thorough research of the issues and common sense are run over by spineless legislators as state employees head for minimum wage. They find a scaperock.

What next? Wisconsin drops galena because it contains lead and the same with limestone in Tennessee for trace amounts of arsenic. Nope, didn’t say it. Don’t give them any ideas.

Update: Sacramento Bee | California state-rock bill has serpentine agenda. It turns out that it’s not a simple case of “nanny state” but something more sinister: a jobs stimulus plan for personal injury lawyers.

Were SB 624 to become law, declaring serpentine as carcinogenic, it could widen the opportunities for lawsuits against owners of property with naturally occurring outcroppings of serpentine. And it’s become a new skirmish in the perennial war between personal injury lawyers and the business-backed Civil Justice Association of California.

8 comments

Oh good, now we won’t have to drive all the way down to the coast to see it.

nola.com gallery: Oil has reached Lake Pontchartrain “Strong southeast winds [have] pushed [it] into Lake Pontchartrain Monday July 5, 2010.”

Update: 1,020 pounds of oil waste removed from Rigolets and lake

2 comments

The Oil Drum | BP’s Deepwater Oil Spill – Not Everything is Clearly Successful

And at that drilling speed, they should be perhaps [be] there by now, in fact this number would suggest that they might have reached it. There then still remains the delay while they run that casing, which could be some significant additional time, depending on conditions.

… The voyage of the A Whale to sweep up large quantities of oil has so far been inconclusive and, despite the large fleet of vessels employed for the process, only an average of 900 barrels a day is reported as having been skimmed and recovered, initially by the two companies BP relied on.

nola.com | Media, boaters could face criminal penalties by entering oil cleanup ‘safety zone’

“The safety zone has been put in place to protect members of the response effort, the installation and maintenance of oil containment boom, the operation of response equipment and protection of the environment by limiting access to and through deployed protective boom,” the news release said.

… In order to get within the 65-foot limit, media must call the Coast Guard captain of the Port of New Orleans, Edwin Stanton, to get permission.

0 comments

We’re free! But, freedom isn’t! Oh well, neither are gasoline and fireworks. Load ’em up!

Some reading as you go into this 234th birthday of America.

Scientists Discover Thomas Jefferson Wrote “Subjects” Before Replacing Word with “Citizens” when Drafting Declaration

Preservation scientists at the Library of Congress have discovered that Thomas Jefferson, even in the act of declaring independence from Britain, had trouble breaking free from monarchial rule.

In an early draft of the Declaration of Independence, the famous founder wrote the word “subjects,” when he referred to the American public. He then erased that word and replaced it with “citizens,” a term he used frequently throughout the final draft.

Fast Company | Video Suggests BP Literally Covering Up Oil Damage on Louisiana Beaches

There’s no question that BP has lied extensively over the past few months about the growing Gulf oil disaster. The company has bullied journalists, fudged numbers, and even deployed fake journalists to the Gulf to write about how everything is fine. Now BP may be literally trying to cover up oiled beaches by dumping sand on top of them.

WWTJD?

2 comments

The Tyranny of the “Daily 10 Percent”

Julie Starr of Evolving Newsroom makes a compelling case for consumers going to the news and actively filtering it instead of waiting for repetitive and useless bits of it to wash over us. One of Starr’s suggestions is a challenge for journalists: Fix How the news gets out before What goes in it. I ask: Why not both?

I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve heard someone say or said myself in a fit of pique that ˜the news is rubbish“, ˜we need more investigative journalism“, ˜we need better analysis“, ˜who cares about that celebrity nonsense“ or ˜if I see one more crime story under the heading of National News I’m going to spit.“

… There“s an uncomfortable truth in here, of course, in that we, the audience, can be hopelessly lazy about ˜staying informed“ and the best filtering tools in the world won’t help us if we don’t take the time to set them up.

The battle to get us to pay for news is as much a battle to get us to want to read much of it in the first place.  Same goes for a more informed citizenry.

… Maybe, then, we future-of-news types should focus on how to better get the ˜news we approve of“ out to people in a format, time and place that makes them interested. Maybe we should focus on how to get that daily 10 per cent working better for people now before we throw buckets of money at funding ˜better journalism“ that may only get lost in the mix.

This is a conundrum I’ve often encountered when fine-tuning my feed-reader: How do I know what to read if I don’t know it exists?

1 comment