My Grandmother 1916-2009

My Grandmother 1916-2009

I would rush in, squeal “Pattiiiiiiiii!” and give her tiny body a bone-crushing hug.  She’d break into a wide smile, straighten her nine yards of sari and say, “Little Maitri, you’re just the same.  When I look at your face, it’s like looking at you when you were five years old.  Even your mannerisms haven’t changed.”  That was our routine for thirty four years.  And that is how I will always remember my grandmother, my Patti.

At 10pm on Sunday, after a visit during which she didn’t open her eyes once while struggling to breathe through her mouth, I held her hand and said quietly in Tamil, “You are my favorite grandmother.  Forget that, you are the only grandparent I have truly known.  Right now, I don’t feel frustration at your pain and your insistence on living like this.  I feel nothing but love for you.”  With that, I smiled, kissed her hand and her right cheek and left for my home.  Less than two hours later, not minutes after my head hit the pillow, my brother called with the news that Patti had passed away, surrounded by my mother, father, uncle, aunt and a nurse.   I remember now my last coherent thought before hearing the news: “This is no way for such a great woman to live.  Please let her not suffer like this any longer.”

Regal, elegant Patti.  Even in death.  While my uncle and father informed family and friends and funeral arrangements began, my mother and I cleaned and dressed Patti in a green sari, her favorite color, and prepared her for family who would arrive starting at sunrise.  Predestination is not my philosophy of choice, but as I arranged the folds of the sari on her lithe, sleeping frame, it all made sense.  This is why I moved back to Ohio.  This is why I wasn’t away on business.  Just for this very moment.

Ninety three years is a long time to live.  In that time, she raised eight successful, idiosyncratic children and was there for their children, her sixteen grandchildren and four great-grandchildren.  As my mother said last night, Patti made each one of us feel special, as if we were her favorite and no one else.   And not just members of the immediate family.  She saw the good in every single person she interacted with and would only remember them fondly.  This is probably why 300 people showed up at the visitation yesterday although her obituary did not appear in the paper until today.  Desi, not desi, Hindu, not Hindu, young, old, they were all there.

There are scores of amazing things Patti did in her life.  She taught herself English at a young age in the heart of South India, drew masterpieces in color theory with no formal training and created museum-worthy dioramas, miniatures and costumes from common household goods.  Small yet quick and resourceful, she managed a large joint household consisting of her own brood and in-laws and, as I found out only last night, saved one of her sons and my brother from drowning (in the same temple tank but decades apart, oddly enough).  The most telling, however, was her modernity.  At a time when good Tam-Brahm South Indian wives were supposed to keep their children on conservative life paths, she allowed her sons to cross the seven seas, encouraged all four of her daughters to get college educations and eventually let every single one of her children leave the nest to make their own homes in unknown lands like North India, Kuwait and the United States.

She retained this progressive world view well into her old age.  I dare anyone to find me a vegetarian, Orthodox-Hindu nanogenerian who was more accepting of the western-ness of her grandchildren than their parents, watched MTV with these kids, listened to their school and college stories, marveled at their non-traditional ways and welcomed her granddaughter’s non-Hindu-Indian husband into her family with open arms (to the point where I was chopped liver when D was in the room, but that’s neither here nor there).  Point out to me an Old World grandmother who had her granddaughter teach her the fundamentals of geology and computer visualization so she could understand that granddaughter’s graduate theses.  Find me a Tamil-speaking, nine-yards-sari-wearing bubbeh who flew from Kuwait to New York City accompanied only by two Arabic-speaking youngsters and communicated with them.  While others feared experience and change, Patti viewed life as an adventure, ready before everyone to go forth and explore.  There was nothing she could not do, there was nothing she kept us from doing.  If our family has strong, efficient women who do even when men tell us not to, it is because of her.

Patti lives in us now.  For the last two days, I did what I do best at times like this – make lists and take charge.  I dressed Patti with my mother, made sure her sari was always just right, followed her to the hearse with my father and uncle, wrote her obituary with my uncle and sent it off to the local paper, got her stuff together, drove my mother and aunts (my other mothers) to the funeral home where we changed her into a beautiful royal-blue sari, wrote her eulogy with kind edits from my brother, delivered it at her service and was the only woman who stood next to her until the incinerator took her at 5pm yesterday.  She would have done the same and expected nothing less of me.  I see this quality in my baby niece, who patiently accompanied us all day yesterday, holding, hugging and consoling when my mother, sister-in-law or I broke down and observing with tears and strength as Patti was prepared for the fire.  She is the rock of the next generation.

It’s sinking in today, now that I’m back at my desk and not going, going, going.  I don’t know what is worse – that my mother lost her mother or the world lost a treasure.  But, I am fully certain that she lived a long, full life, not one of us had any interest in wanting her to stay alive only to suffer and it was her time to go.  Patti, for you to whom all of us have gone to for comfort, we know that you are now in eternal comfort.  I love you and miss you. Thank you for being my grandmother.

Where 2.0 Impressions

This week, I’m at the Where2.0 conference in San Jose, California. It’s all about making maps, now enabled by the web and mobile devices.  If you really want to know what’s going on, search #where20 in Twitter.  I’m surprised we’re not a trending topic given the internet-choking number of tweets coming out of here.  What the hell is #woofwednesday and why is it a Top 10 trending topic?

While most everyone is going on about APIs and platforms, I am as always enthralled with novel ways to access and visualize data. In this arena, I’ve been impressed by the presented work of Stamen Design’s Maps From Scratch, Urban Mapping‘s transit trees and animations (GORGEOUS stuff, but I can’t find pictures or videos online – if you do, please provide links in the comments) and Sense Networks’ CitySense 4D heatmaps. Other than being beautiful and innovative mapping techniques (which make you go “Wow, this data makes so much more sense viewed like that!”), they remind you not to be dependent on Google or another major map API to the point where you force your perception into accepting that there are only certain ways to view our world. In other words, let the data and relationships between that data dictate the map, rather than allow a pre-canned map define the data.  Again, I’m all about (Open) standards, but let’s not standardize our way into a small dark box.

Also liked:

- Nokia’s Ovi Maps Beta with 2.5D buildings on faux (shaded) terrain. 3D structures on georeferenced 3D terrain, in my opinion, is the only way to understand built-up spaces in geographic context.

- Greater New Orleans Community Data Center’s Denice Ross and James Fee talk on how junk mail and the geoweb helped a tally of post-Katrina repopulation numbers.  Denice’s advice: Create metadata-rich & usable maps which present correct information that matter to locals.

- Grand vizier Jack Dangermond‘s talk on online mapping enabling the government into transparency, accountability and coughing up data.

- Matthew Ericson, deputy graphics director at The New York Times, showing us how they made some of my favorite 2008 presidential election RedState-BlueState maps.

Dude, Velodyne Lidar demo with Radiohead’s House Of Cards laser!  Gotta go.

links for 2009-05-19

From Stable Craton To Earthquake Country

null

A 5.0 rippled through the Los Angeles area last night breaking store windows and toppling milk jugs in its wake. And I’m going to the Silicon Valley for a week? Am I crazy? Asks the geologist who made an almost annual pilgrimage to the San Andreas Fault Zone until 2005.

Many on Twitter naturally freaked out last night about the sudden plate movement. It doesn’t happen out of nowhere, though. Earthquake activity along a gigantic, active plate boundary is constant, as the figure above shows, it’s just what you’re able to feel that makes the news. Think of it as a gas-fueled engine – constantly rumbling and chugging along, with the occasional pop when something sticks.

Off to the land of ground rumbling beneath my feet.

Quote Of The Day

“Some people just don’t get this new media thing, and cling to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other protections like someone cowering behind a triple locked door thinking that will solve the crime problem outside, thinking it will save their little corner of the music industry. It will not.”
– Mark Folse of Toulouse Street

Related: In a distribution lawsuit, RealNetworks calls the MPAA a “price-fixing cartel” and states that “the DMCA does not apply because the company is not circumventing technology.” Never mind that I hate Real’s products, someone had to do this.

Not Buying The Kindle

As a supporter of Project Gutenberg‘s eBook philosophy, I refuse to purchase a device that operates solely in proprietary file format and has hinky public domain vs. copyright and ownership issues associated with it. Lately, the PG-forum arguments for and against the Kindle have turned into ones of readability; subjective terms such as “comfortable” and “readable” are thrown about in place of that device’s accessibility and obsolescence. Personally, I have no problems reading the entire fraking Odyssey on my iPhone’s Stanza app after having downloaded it directly from Project Gutenberg. First of all, minimum eyestrain given that I practically live on my iPhone.  And other phones exist that offer comfort and reader resolution for long periods of time.  More importantly, it’s a special-super-secret-format-free, public-domain eBook which I can download again onto another phone once the iPhone is put out to pasture.  Ostensible readability is a sad metric with which to hold the Kindle up as the standard for eBook readers to come.

Back to the shady book ownership issues associated with the Kindle.  Do you know what I like about books more than readability?  The fact that they’re mine.  Once I purchase a book, I can do whatever I want with it: read it silently, read it out loud to myself or someone else, store it on my shelf for years, loan it to a friend, sell it or give it away to a library or school.  The same versatility applies to plain vanilla ASCII e-texts on computers and cellphones.  Can you do that with a Kindle eBook?  The answers range from definitely not to we don’t know, and this is why we cannot let Amazon’s Kindle or any other proprietary book reader establish the technological and legal standards for such devices.  Cory Doctorow writes in today’s BoingBoing (emphases mine):

Back in February, the Authors Guild, a lobby group representing less than 10,000 writers, argued that the Kindle’s ability to read text aloud infringed on copyright (it doesn’t — and even if it does, the infringement lies not in including the feature, but rather in using it; this is the same principle that makes the VCR legal). Amazon folded and agreed to revoke the feature.

Now comes some news about how they’re doing this, from the Knowledge Ecology International site:

“Beginning yesterday, Random House Publishers began to disable text-to-speech remotely. The TTS function has apparently been remotely disabled in over 40 works so far. Affected titles include works by Toni Morrison, Stephen King, and others. Other notable titles include Andrew Meachem’s American Lion, and five of the top ten Random House best-sellers in the Kindle store.”  I’ve been trying to get a statement from Amazon about this since February: how does disabling text-to-speech work? It appears that there’s a text-to-speech “flag” in the Kindle file-format that the Kindle looks for and responds to, disabling the feature if it’s set to 0 (a perl script called mobi2mobi can reset the bit to 1).  But what no one at Amazon will tell me is what other flags are lurking in the Kindle format: is there a “real only once” flag? A “no turning the pages backwards” flag?

This makes me a lot less inclined to purchase a Kindle than arguments about reader vs. phone readability and other straw-boogey-men raised by a few authors, their publishing houses and Amazon.  Think before you buy.  Your purchase has far-reaching media access and ownership implications.

CGSociety & NVidia Announce Winners Of NVArt Competition

The winners of the fourth NVArt Surreal Competition (Thanks, D!)

Looking at the pictures, I wondered, “Why do all of these look like Jacek Yerka‘s work?” until I read the premise of the competition (not a big fan of reading the recipe first).

… artists were invited to recreate their most imaginative fantasies in the style of master surrealist, Jacek Yerka. They did so in good measure, with 400 entries sent in from 65 countries.

First Prize’s work is neat, but I really like the perspective and mystery of Third Prize.

Published: Credibility, Fake Science And Big Money

Not one, but six fake journals from Elsevier.  Waited until now to say something besides “GREEDY PUBLISHERS *SNARGFARG*  COMMUNITY PUBLISHING *PITCHFORKS* STUPID TENURE TRACK *FOAMFOAM* SCIENCE”  Sent an email to my buddies in academia last week: “Where’s your credibility, status and all that fluff now?  Stop feeding your work to these companies and think, be proactive about how it reaches the broader community where it belongs.”  Most responses were “Get professional societies to switch to online publishing and cut out the middleman,” while Dr. Ennis Singh of the Mutiny states “it’s still as prestigious to be an editor at one of the big traditional journals. I’ve seen some efforts to do what you’re suggesting out of Berkeley Press, but honestly, they haven’t been as good.”

I disagree, large publishing houses earned their stars over the years, why can smaller, online, community versions not do the same, especially when these juggernauts raise their prices so much even large university libraries cannot afford to carry their journals?  The time to drop the middleman publisher is now, before he realizes his impending extinction and gets more legislation enacted on his behalf.  But, where to start?  In other words, my most prized structural geology text is was published by Springer, but how to motivate editors to generate this quality of material without being beholden to large publishing houses?

Metacognition And Instinct

In my early college days, I was the campus Minesweeper wizard. Seriously, I was so enthralled by, addicted to, good at and snobbish about this game that I would play it on folks’ computers and beat their scores, rendering them incapable of ever beating the game on their own computers. (I would also conveniently forget to tell them about clearing the high scores in the .ini file.) The odd thing is that I’m no ace gamer – pretty decent at crosswords and Quake deathmatch, mediocre at best at Sudoku and chess. Naturally, all the uber-geeks I hung with were so perplexed by this that they decided to sit me down in front of a computer and ordered me to show them how I went about beating the game. I started out and seconds later, I froze and had to restart. Try after try after try, fail after fail after fail. I shut off the computer, stood up, walked to the door and said, “I can’t.”

“What do you mean you can’t? There is a logical thought process your brain works through when solving a puzzle and you should be able to articulate it.”

“I’m sorry. When I think about my thought, my brain stops thinking like it should. Does that make sense?” Trudging through a foot of Illinois snowfall back to my place, I wondered if my play was through feel or my thought processes were too fast to remember. Or was it stage fright? No, I had played for audiences before, when they weren’t asking about my every move. The sad thing is I remember starting to suck at Minesweeper from then on, because I quit playing and began to analyze and strategize my play.  Not knowing how I did it took all the fun out of doing it.

A few nights ago, D and I listened to Bob Edwards talk to Jonah Lehrer about his new book How We Decide. Decisionmaking, be it in the stock market or choice of paint color, is a complex activity and our decisions are often made for us before we’re even aware of it. Lehrer advocates, however, being proactive about how we decide – thinking about our thought, the hows, the whys, the consequences. This, to my Minesweeping glee, includes letting go of metacognition and allowing instinct to take over as the situation dictates as that too is a part of thinking. Reason and emotion, the objective and the subjective, knowing and feeling, are not separate and suppressing one or the other during decisionmaking is counterproductive. The trick lies in training the brain. Apparently, this can be done, as in the case of Capt. Al Haynes who limited loss of life during his United Airline crash landing by purposefully calming his brain using techniques previously acquired and practised.

Again, emotions and empathy are very much a part of sound judgment and decisionmaking. Or, as the L.A.Times review of the book puts it, “[Lehrer] observes that perfectly intelligent people become virtually unable to make the most trivial decisions when their capacity for feelings are flattened as a result of brain disease or trauma. This is no surprise. Emotions inject our mental representations with direction and intensity.” In the Bob Edwards interview, Lehrer also talked of psychopaths who are, by definition, devoid of any emotion. D lit up on hearing that and, after the interview ended, questioned the conservative media’s criticism of Obama’s desire for empathy as one of the qualifications of David Souter’s SCOTUS replacement. “The lack of empathy is psychopathy and we don’t want psychopaths judging our nation’s cases,” D argued and asked why no one in the media had brought that up.

We’ve been too busy moving into our house to get caught up on The Daily Show. Looks like Jon Stewart addressed this by joking that “we need a reptile on the court.”  Jonah Lehrer refers to this Daily Show segment in a post on The Frontal Cortex and says:

… do voters really want a party that brags of their callousness? I know empathy is a code word for “activist judges,” but it’s still a noun with the following definition: “the ability to understand and share the feelings of another.” Not such a terrible thing, even for a judge.

I also think the conservative argument fails on psychological grounds. After all, the absence of empathy isn’t great jurisprudence: it’s psychopathy … In other words, we banish empathy as a requirement for our judges at our own peril. Our moral decisions are fundamentally emotional decisions, which are rooted in the ability to imagine what someone else is feeling.

It’s not one or the other. Our bad judgment is rooted in our obsession with rational or emotional, rejecting the fact that being human is a combination of both and not wisely choosing a mindset based on the situation.  It also comes from declaring oneself the moral arbiter of all, denying one’s own fallibility, but that’s a topic for another day.

I Sank De Mayo

The only thing my father-in-law and I have in common, besides pushing each other’s political hot buttons and loving D, is a penchant for horrible jokes. And reciting them over and over again. In fact, we even have the same favorite joke. And recite it over and over again. Sad, I know.

D reminded me this morning that I missed sinking da mayo on Cinco De Mayo. It’s never too late and, I don’t care if you’ve heard it a million times (and groan each time), it’s still a good one.

… most people don’t know that back in 1912, Hellman’s mayonnaise was manufactured in England. The “Titanic” was carrying 12,000 jars of the condiment scheduled for delivery in Vera Cruz, Mexico, which was to be the next port of call for the great ship after New York City.

The Mexican people were eagerly awaiting delivery and were disconsolate at the loss. So much so that they declared a national day of mourning which they still observe today. It is known, of course, as Sinko de Mayo.

Thank you, I”ll be here all day. Try the chana masala!

Update: Please feel free to leave your favorite goofy joke in the comments. I need new ones for the old man.